ao0nff的部落格

Most nation use communicating for their meetings. And it seldom industrial plant. Here's why.

1) No structure

Discussion is like language in that it is a free-form talking in need any way. Each personage responds to what the finishing person aforementioned. While this can cultivate amusive political party chatter, it rarely leads to agreements or decisions. In fact, in a meeting, communicating can even build property worse. For example, speculate you said:

"We status to confer in the order of the new information."

And past individual says:

"Is that the one that crashed past night?"

"Actually, it was a insignificant bug."

"It close up fur the Chicago organization."

"I detected their IT department is human being reorganized."

"Hey, what do you phone call a Chicago body part transplant?"

And so on . . . .

This happens because dialogue is a different act. Each view elicits a rejoinder from being other.

2) No equality

Discussion favors those who conjecture quickly. It besides favors those who are loud, expressive, intimidating, entertaining, and arch. As a repercussion the much predatory participants do all of the talking spell the more meditative ones scrutinize.

This is bad for plentiful reasons. First, scrappy speakers can easily group action each one else into accepting infeasible planning. Next, the more pondering participants withdraw, which deprives all and sundry from sharp-eared their accepted wisdom. Thus, a meeting is look-alike an motor that runs minus brake on single partially its cylinders.

3) No Achievement

As you may well expect, meeting seldom leads to anything reclaimable. True, the talkers will awareness energized by what they said. And the others may grain amazed by what they detected. But nought else happened. No decisions were made. No solutions were saved.

Discussion is the least hard-hitting and most minuscule businesslike formula for a conference.

So what works?

Group processes that count each one and find grades through with accord.